Charlene Chambers’s Contributor Page – Associated Content

http://www.associatedcontent.comuser/531442/charlene_chambers.html

Leave a comment »

Forgive Us Our Daily Toxins

Have you ever thought about how many chemicals your body takes in each day? We eat, breath, drink, sleep, and work, with chemicals every day. Have you ever thought about what those chemicals might doing to our body’s balance or immunity? Now I’m not talking about natural, normal chemicals, I’m talking dangerous, potentially deadly chemicals.  There are chemicals in our homes, the air, our food, just about every single thing around us, so what do we do?

            Lately it seems that all the forces of life, the economy, the planet, disease, keep trying to point us back to the old ways of living, more home cooking, gardening, organic greener lives in general, a more natural way of living. Sort of coming full circle, so to speak, and we need to heed the signs around us and change our ways or suffer major consequences in the future not to mention the mess we will leave the future generations.

            I had decided a while ago to change my life and that included trying to live more natural, eating healthier, using natural products, etc. What I didn’t realize was how much of a change it would be. I started looking at all the products I use in a day and honestly couldn’t believe what I was coming in contact with or ingesting every day. Just one example is baby lotion I started using it because it sounds safe, used for babies, so it should be safe right? Well I looked at the list of ingredients and found a list that went on and on so I began to research some of them and found that there’s nothing pure in there, one being the second one listed, propylene glycol, which I found out is used in many cosmetics, soaps, shampoo, baby powder, and other products but is also found in tire sealant, rubber cleaner, degreaser, paint, adhesive, and more. Known to cause eye and skin irritation, skin drying, and according to The Material Safety Data Sheet users should avoid contact with skin since this strong skin irritant can cause liver abnormalities and kidney damage, this is in baby lotion! If you look at a list of ingredients on any label they are listed from the greatest amount to least according to what is in there and this chemical, propylene glycol, is the second listed ingredient after water, meaning it is mostly made of this chemical. This specific baby lotion is Johnson’s bedtime baby lotion with lavender, but also in regular Johnson’s baby lotion (pink bottle). I looked at another Johnson’s baby lotion with cocoa and shea butter and found it was still in there but at a different level on the ingredient list. This is something that is aimed at babies for purity and safety but it is far from it no matter how you spin it. Now keep in mind I am discussing the category of hygiene products like lotions, cosmetics, soaps, etc.  

Starting with a family of chemicals called parabens, which are in almost all products on the market, it is a chemical preservative and may be seen as methyl, propyl, butyl, and ethyl (alkyl-p-hydoxybenzoates) paraben, which according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “displayed estrogenic activity (stimulating the hormone estrogen which is known to stimulate breast and ovarian cancer) in several tests.” Meaning that these chemicals can disrupt your endocrine system by mimicking the body’s own hormones, the organs within the endocrine system that are disrupted include the hypothalamus, ovaries, your thyroid, and pretty much all systems in your body. The EPA also states “continual introduction of these benzoates (parabens) into the sewage treatment systems and directly to recreational waters from the skin leads to the question of risk to aquatic organisms.” As a matter of fact European scientists “found other endocrine-disrupting body care chemicals in the bodies of fish that humans are eating and in human breast milk.” Dr. Elizabeth Smith also points out that besides estrogen stimulating breast cancer, absorbing any substance through the skin can have an effect of 10 times the concentration compared to an oral dose, chemicals are absorbed through the skin as in the nicotine patches, so the chemicals in lotions and the like are also absorbed through your skin.  Another affect of parabens to point out comes from research done by Dr. S. Oishi (at the Department of Toxicology, Tokyo Metropolitan Research Laboratory of Public Health) who found that exposure to butylparaben on newborn male mammals caused adverse affects on the secretion of testosterone and “the function of the male reproductive system.”  These are hormones normally in our bodies and our body works hard to maintain a balance of them so adding more by stimulation or absorption causes an unnecessary stress on your system and adding to the chance of disease that large amounts of these can cause.

            Estrogen (which is the hormone that parabens mimic) is the hormone that is responsible for puberty in girls, development of breasts and hips, then in adult women estrogen gives us soft skin, vaginal lubrication, helps with bone density, and is important for brain function. In men estrogen plays a role by assisting the function of testosterone and also has influence of bone density and cognitive function. Balance within our body that is the most crucial thing for our health. That being said I will list symptoms and problems from an imbalance (too much) of estrogen.

According to an article found on gynecologicalhealth.com (Herrera, 2008), Dr. Igor Tabrizian outlines some of these symptoms from what is being called “estrogen dominance” (imbalance in estrogen and progesterone) in Nutritional Medicine: Fact and Fiction?(NRS Publishing 2002):

  • Allergies and Asthma
  • Missed or irregular periods
  • Swollen or Fibroycystic Breasts
  • Irritability
  • Fatigue
  • PMS
  • Infertility
  • PCOS
  • Fibroids
  • Mood Swings
  • Magnesium deficiency
  • Thyroid dysfunction

Also stated in another article by Laura Owens (menopause.com, 2008) Dr. John Lee, a pioneer in women’s health and author of “Hormone Balance Made Simple” says “over a long period of time too much estrogen may put her health in danger.”

“Estrogen dominance is known to cause and/or contribute to”:

  • Cancer of the breast, ovary, endometrium and prostate (men).
  • PMS, mood changes, anxiety, irritability
  • Menopausal symptoms
  • Weight gain
  • Bloating
  • Mood swings
  • Tender breasts
  • Headaches
  • Fatigue
  • Depression
  • Hypoglycemia
  • Uterine fibroids
  • Endometriosis
  • Fibrocystic breasts.

 These are estrogen mimicking chemicals that build up in our tissues over time and the source of these chemicals are from things like soaps, lotions, cosmetics, pesticides, acetate (nail polish remover), plastic’s, the list goes on. These estrogen mimicking chemicals are called xenoestrogens, they are synthetic and very potent and toxic to our body because they are not efficiently cleared from our body.

            In an article from the Environmental Working Group website, “Phthalates, called “plasticizers,” are a group of industrial chemicals used to make plastics like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) more flexible or resilient and also as solvents.” “Phthalates are nearly ubiquitous in modern society, found in, among other things, toys, food packaging, hoses, raincoats, shower curtains, vinyl flooring, wall coverings, lubricants, adhesives, detergents, nail polish, hair spray and shampoo.” “Phthalates have been found to disrupt the endocrine system.” “Several phthalate compounds have caused reduced sperm counts, testicular atrophy and structural abnormalities in the reproductive systems of male test animals, and some studies also link phthalates to liver cancer” according to the U.S. Center for Disease Control’s 2005 National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. “Though the CDC contends the health hazards of phthalates to humans have not been definitively established, for some years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has regulated phthalates as water and air pollutants.” The Environmental Working Group has focused on phthalates since 1998, when bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was discovered and that dibutyl phthalate “was present in the bodies of every single person tested for industrial pollutants.”

The reason these, and other, harmful chemicals have not been banned is really because the FDA has absolutely NO regulations on how many (or what) potentially carcinogenic chemicals are allowed in cosmetics, which include washes (soap), lotions, etc. and this is a very large loophole for these companies so they get away with it (Soapchix.wordpress.com 2009). As noted on the FDA website there are no real regulations in this area of manufacturing, so pretty much anything goes and we don’t have a clue to what we are buying or putting on our body that eventually ends up in our body. Consumers do not know enough about these toxic chemicals and we blindly follow the ads that draw us in to use these products not knowing the harm that can come from them.

            Here is a list of the top ten toxins to avoid and unfortunately these toxins are in most common products we use.

BHA – (Butylated hydroxyanisole) Toxic to the liver, immune and nervous systems; possible carcinogen

BHT – (Butylated hydroxytoluene) Toxic to the brain, nervous, and respiratory systems; possible carcinogen and endocrine disruptor

D & C Colorants – Toxic to nervous and reproductive systems

Eugenol – Toxic to the immune and nervous systems, endocrine disruptor

Formaldehyde – Toxic to the immune and respiratory systems; carcinogen

Nitrosamines – endocrine disruptor; possible carcinogen

P-Phenylenediamine – Toxic to the immune, respiratory, and nervous systems

Parabens – Endocrine disruptor, neurotoxic; possible carcinogen

Phthalates – Toxic to the immune, nervous, and reproductive systems

Triethanolamine – Toxic to the immune and respiratory systems; possible carcinogen

These chemicals are found in cosmetics, soaps, lotions, pretty much all products we use on a daily basis, they are not regulated even though they have been proven harmful. (This list was found on the website TheGoodHuman.com.)

To give you an idea of what all this means I’ll give you a brief description of the endocrine system and its function in maintaining balance for our health. The endocrine system is a very important part of our overall health it works with other systems and organs of our body such as the nervous system, reproductive system, kidneys, liver, digestive system, pancreas, and fat, to control and maintain a variety of things within us such as:

  1. Energy levels
  2. Reproduction
  3. Internal balance of systems called homeostasis
  4. Growth and development
  5. Response to our surroundings like stress and injury (fight or flight response)

The endocrine system controls all these functions through a network of glands and organs which produce, store, and secrete the hormones needed for each process. Different hormones produce specific effects on cells or tissues of the body they are produced and stored to be used as needed. Problems can arise when there is an imbalance in these hormones and cannot be controlled normally by the body such as the hormone mimicking of the chemicals mentioned earlier. An environmental endocrine disruptor (EED) is exactly what these chemicals (parabens, nitrosamines, etc.) are and they are in all kinds of common products we use. EED’s can cause adverse affects to the normal functioning of the endocrine system, they mimic what our natural hormones would perform by binding at the target cell receptor causing the same processes between our body’s cells and our natural hormone, these are called hormone agonists.

      The other group of EED’s called antagonists block cellular events associated with hormone binding. Others can directly interfere with production, release, storage, transport, clearance and binding, or the elimination of endogenous hormones in the body so this can greatly affect functions of other body systems.

To give you an idea of how many chemicals are introduced to your body every day I am going to show you a typical morning routine. Keep in mind this is just an average morning hygiene routine not including breakfast, or any other part of the day. To start say you are using Olay Total Effects face wash, here is the list of ingredients (remember ingredients are listed by concentration of most to least):

Olay Total Effects: Water, sodium lauroamphoacetate, glycerin, sorbitol, sodium myristoyl sarcosinate, sodium trideceth sulfate, PEG-200 hydrogenated glyceryl palmate, sodium laureth sulfate, citric acid, PEG-7 glyceryl cocoate, acrylates copolymer, glycol distearate, polyquartenium-10, PEG-100, fragrance, lauric acid, cocamide mea, disodium EDTA, tocopheryl acetate, niacinamide, laureth-10, BHT, methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, pentadecacactone.

Body wash:

Bodycology body wash (coconut lime): Water, ammonium lauryl sulfate, ammonium laureth sulfate, lauramide DEA, lauryl glucoside, cocamidopropyl betaine, glyceryl distearate, cocamide MEA, laureth-10, fragrance, quarternium-92, aloe barbadensis leaf juice, dipropylene glycol, prunus amygdalus dulcis (sweet almond oil), honey, sodium chloride, PEG-40 hydrogenated castor oil, polyquarternium-10, benzophenone-4, disodium EDTA, triethanolamine, citric acid, DMDM hydantoin, blue 1, yellow 5.

Shampoo and Conditioner:

Suave Professionals Biobasics Shampoo: Water, ammonium lauryl sulfate, ammonium laureth sulfate, cocamide MEA, PEG-5 cocamide, sodium citrate, glycol distearate, fragrance, ammonium chloride, cocamidopropyl betaine, dimethicone propyl PG-betaine, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, bishydroxyethyl dihyroxypropyl stearammonium chloride, citric acid, tetrasodium EDTA, DMDM hydantoin, glycerin, ammonium xylenesulfonate, tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E acetate), arginine HLC, lysine HCI, panthenol, panthenyl ethyl ether, propylene glycol, methylchloroisothiazolinone, silk amino acids, methylisothiazolinone, quillaja saponaria bark extract, chamomilla recutita (matricaria) extract, rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary) leaf extract.

Suave Professionals Biobasics Conditioner: Water, cetearyl alcohol, cetrimonium chloride, dimethiconol, fragrance, quartermium-18, potassium chloride, hydroxyethylcellulose, propylene glycol, disodium EDTA, DMDM hydantoin, TEA-dodecylbenzenesulfonate, tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E acetate), arginine HCI, lysine HCI, panthenol, panthenyl ethyl ether, methylchloroisothiazolinone, silk amino acids, methylisothiazolinone, rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary) leaf extract, sorbitol, hydrastis Canadensis (golden seal) extract, glycerin, algae extract.

Moisturizer:

 Johnson’s baby lotion with lavender: Water, propylene glycol, myristyl myristate, oleic acid, polysorbate 61, C12-15 alkyl benzoate, dimethicone, isopropyl palmitate, sorbitan stearate, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, synthetic beeswax, benzyl alcohol, carbomer, methylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, BHT, fragrance, sodium hydroxide.

 (Remember the second ingredient listed (meaning it is highest ingredient after water) propylene glycol which is a hazardous chemical as explained previously, also note BHT and 3 parabens in the lotions ingredients, mentioned on the top ten most toxic chemicals list above.)

Something all parents should be aware of is the false claims of purity from baby products like Johnson&Johnson:   “Last month the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and partner organizations released a report revealing that dozens of popular bath products for babies and kids contain at least two hazardous contaminants: 1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde”. “Both of these chemicals cause cancer in animals, and formaldehyde is also known to cause skin rashes in people who are sensitive to the chemical” (Campaign for Safe Cosmetics 2009). Full story and link to stop the use of these chemicals: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5500/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1426

 

Next is anti-perspirant deodorant:

 Active ingredient: aluminum chlorohydrate.

Inactive ingredients: Cyclopentasiloxane, isopropyl palmitate, stearyl alcohol, mineral oil, talc, hydrogenated castor oil, fragrance, steareth-100, BHT.

 Brushing teeth is next: Colgate Total Whitening Gel: Active ingredients: Sodium fluoride, triclosan.

Inactive ingredients: Water, hydrated silica, glycerin, sorbitol, PVM/MA copolymer, sodium lauryl sulfate, cellulose gum, flavor, sodium hydroxide, propylene glycol, carrageenan, sodium saccharin, mica, titanium dioxide, FD&C blue #1.

I would like to note that in Crest Whitening Expressions Refreshing Vanilla Mint and Crest Whitening Expressions Extreme Herbal Mint has polyethylene in the ingredients. Polyethylene a polymerized ethylene resin (plastics) used to make containers, kitchenware, tubing, etc. (Note this, polyethylene, was not found in the same brand Cinnamon Rush.)

Mouthwash follows, Crest Pro-Health: Active ingredient: Cetylpyridinium.

Inactive ingredients: Water, glycerin, flavor, poloxamer 407, methylparaben, sodium saccharin, propylparaben, blue 1.

Starting with a simple morning hygiene routine you have just introduced the body to a barrage of chemicals, 5 parabens, 3 BHT, 4 colorants, that’s just 3 I’ve noted from the top ten list of toxic chemicals from this point on you can add food additives, cosmetic chemicals, pesticides, cleaning chemicals, environmental toxins, and so much more. We have to be mindful of all these toxins and what it’s doing to our health and our environment. We need to take control of what we are exposed to and do something about it, manufacturers have been getting away with basically killing us for too long, their profit is their priority.

      The FDA needs to classify and regulate cosmetics, the problem with reclassifying cosmetics would be the gray area they fall into and the fact that the FDA does not regulate what goes into the cosmetic and hygiene products, so basically the manufacturer has free reign. The company can use any ingredients they want as long as the label states the necessary claims to get them onto the shelves.

According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG) “7,500 products tested by the EWG, a mere 28 had been evaluated for safety by the CIR. The EWG found that one in every 120 products analyzed contained ingredients certified by the government as known or probable carcinogens and that nearly one-third of the products contained ingredients classified as possible carcinogens. Astoundingly, 54 products even violated recommendations for safe use that the CIR had put in place, yet these products are still available for sale today” (EWG/ Connealy 2006).

Another thing I found interesting was the rise in use of Alpha Hydroxy Acids (AHA) and Beta Hydroxy Acids (BHA) for acne, scarring, wrinkles, yet it causes doubling of UV-induced skin damage and potential higher risk for skin cancer. These acids were found in 1 out of 17 products the EWG analyzed and 10% of those were moisturizers with 6% sunscreen, the irony is the FDA and/or manufacturer has no warning label regulation considering some of these products containing the dangerous BHA and AHA acids are designed specifically for use in the sun. So you are adding a product to your skin thinking you are getting some protection yet you are actually adding to the risk for skin cancer (EWG/Connealy 2006). Sunscreens contain zinc (one of the main active ingredients) and has been shown just recently that concentrations of zinc in the body will cause neurological problems. This link has come to light with denture creams and possible overuse, causing neurological problems in people that were using them; so following this revelation I began to think about using a shot glass full of sunscreen (as we’re told we should, reapply at least every 2 hours) and then going in the sun while letting the sun bake this into the skin thus into the bloodstream which could eventually show up as health problems, something to consider. (http://www.usrecallnews.com/2009/04/fda-should-warn-about-zinc-poisoning-from-denture-creams.html)

How about a cosmetic company supporting breast cancer research but putting known carcinogens in their products? It’s happening in almost all products you use on your body including baby products (Johnson&Johnson) these are 2 very controversial ingredients that are in your products, in your home right now (as mentioned earlier but warrants bringing it up again):

 Parabens and phthalates, which recent studies indicate may be linked to cancer development.

  • Parabens are chemical preservatives that have been identified as estrogenic and disruptive of normal hormone function. (Estrogenic chemicals mimic the function of the naturally occurring hormone estrogen, and exposure to external estrogens has been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer.)
  • Phthalates are known to cause a broad range of birth defects and lifelong reproductive impairments in laboratory animals that are exposed to these chemicals during pregnancy and after birth. Phthalates are also known to be hormone-mimicking chemicals, many of which disrupt normal hormonal processes, raising concern about their implications for increased breast cancer risk (Thinkbeforeyoupink.com 2007). End result is these products are in many ways drugs that do influence the function of our body so there needs to be something done to prevent the health risks these chemicals cause whether they are classified as drugs or not it should be stopped.

Improvements in the laws to protect us would be to stop any use of any chemical that could even remotely cause harm to us. There are products out there that are natural and don’t use these chemicals so why can’t all products become natural or be forced to be for the sake of public health. The manufacturer wants to sell the products regardless of any risks money again is the ruling factor.

With soaps the same applies, as far as labeling it as a drug, if it claims to treat acne or other skin conditions or contains the same parabens or other harmful chemicals that do affect the body’s function then it should carry some sort of drug label. Body wash has these parabens and other harmful chemicals in them that have been shown to be harmful to us. Skin does absorb so it makes sense that the possibility of these chemicals leeching into the skin is certain, common sense should tell us this is another gray area to be looked into. Imported products fall into the same scenario as above especially since they may use ingredients that are even more dangerous than are used in this country.

I think labeling is minimal because it would certainly hurt sales so they try to hide or minimize what is disclosed about the product, it’s up to the poor consumer to become an investigative reporter to find out what they are really using and it should not be that way. I believe there should be full disclosure so the public is aware and can make informed decisions from there.

I feel that any chemical or ingredient that could alter the function of our body should be regulated at the least, but banned altogether, preferably. Ironically under a law called the Delaney Clause it is illegal “to expose people to a drug found to induce cancer in experimental animals” (Douglass, 2007 p.1) there are so many things we have to deal with everyday from the environment like pollution, pesticides, to what we ingest or use on our body it’s insane and overwhelming for the average person to be “on top” of all this stuff. So whether it’s the FDA or another agency that overlooks the ingredients in products, something should be done. It’s not right, morally, that people’s lives are at stake by buying products we are taught to trust, since until you investigate for yourself or after X amount of years of use shows a product causes disease and is pulled from the shelves, we believe we are safe and we’re not.

Some people don’t have the resources or time to investigate ingredients in what they are buying but that doesn’t mean they deserve to get ill from harmful chemicals or ingredients either, that’s the purpose of laws and regulations to protect the public but it doesn’t seem to apply to most products.

It is completely ridiculous and criminal for companies to use ingredients that can cause harm and not disclose the risk, but that would certainly hurt profits so what is the answer? The labels may tell you what is in the product but it does not tell you what may be a risk or in what way, it’s shameful what all these companies get away with and that includes the food industry too. The baby products struck me hard though, I can’t believe that a trusted company such as, Johnson&Johnson, are using these harmful ingredients that we use on our babies. A baby that is completely pure and new to our world of so many dangers, then to introduce their little systems to something volatile,  is negligence at the least and criminal at best.

Also I have come to question many decisions the FDA makes, they have mislead us over and over, what they approve is at times insane and what they do not is highly questionable as to why not.

It is such a sad world when we have to research every angle before we use a product, it’s amazing when you look into the amount of dangerous chemicals we are exposed to daily, isn’t it. Parabens have caught my attention lately since they mimic estrogen the leading cause in breast and other cancers and with the rise in the rate of cancer you have to wonder; also talc used on the female genitals have shown to cause ovarian cancer, not to mention breathing it in can cause respiratory problems. Pretty scary when you think how common it has always been to use it on ourselves and our babies! Makes you think.

There are so many things out there that cause harm, whether you drink it, eat it, or use it the possibility of a harmful substance being in the ingredients is more likely than not. So unless we become more educated and take charge of our body and what goes in or on it there is a constant threat to our health.

Be aware and be pro-active.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

 Douglass, W. (2007). Real Health Breakthroughs. The Douglass Report, Retrieved January    29, 2009, from http://www.douglassreport.com/

 

  http://www.ewg.org/

Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, (2009 May ). Ask Johnson & Johnson to live up to its “pure” and “gentle” claims. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from Campaign for Safe Cosmetics Web site: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5500/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1426

Connealy, L. (2006, January 20). Beauty to die for: health hazards of cosmetics and skin care products revealed . Retrieved May 18, 2009, from Natural News Web site: http://www.naturalnews.com/016898.html

Think Before You Pink, (2007). Cosmetic companies and breast cancer. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from Think Before You Pink Web site: http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org/Pages/CosmeticCompanies.html

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (2009). Cosmetics. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cos-toc.html

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (2009). Is It a Cosmetic, a Drug, or Both?. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cos-218.html

Comments (1) »

Does Your Baby Have Colic?

Does Your Baby Have Colic?

            I know what you are going through, I had two babies and both had colic. It’s a horrible trauma for you and the baby, the constant crying, not knowing what to do and everything you try does not help so you feel like screaming. I do understand I couldn’t even take a shower without having my mother come over to help with the baby I even threw my neck out stifling a sneeze because I finally got her to sleep and didn’t want to wake her! I tried every wives tale my mother had from mixing my own formulas (after trying every possible solution from the pediatrician) to putting the baby seat on the washer for the vibration to gently shake the gas out, enemas, mylicon drops, peppermint, you name it I tried it (and breast fed babies get colic too). Then a miracle happened I stumbled upon trying goat’s milk and it worked!! Within 2 weeks there was blissful peace aww.

            There are no medical “reasons” or clear cut definition for colic it is the diagnosis you get when everything else has been ruled out. There are theories behind colic because doctors and researchers still have no clue to what colic really is but the signs are usually constant crying, especially at certain times of the day, their belly is hard, stools are hard to pass, they pull their legs up and stiffen, it’s a horrible condition for all involved you don’t want your baby in pain and you want to rip your hair out from frustration and lack of rest. Some of the theories out there on what colic may be are GERD (gastroesophageal reflux), allergy, lactose intolerance, constipation, the list goes on but the bottom line is it is suffering with no relief.

            Goat’s milk does work and has shown to be a good supplement to breast milk such as in between breast feedings and the baby makes the transition well from one to the other unlike using other substitutes. Replacing or substituting goat’s milk for other infant formulas has the same benefits, such as stopping colic, baby is more satisfied between feedings,  it protects the lining of the digestive tract, plus speeds the assimilation of nutrients and with the vitamin drops usually given to baby’s any nutrient deficits should be nonexistent.

            Goat’s milk is a change we all should consider since it has high nutritional value and more benefits than cow’s milk. Let me present some facts about goat’s milk that are pretty impressive first goat’s milk has more buffering capacity than over the counter (OTC) antacids to reduce indigestion, soothes an irritated stomach and intestines, important when dealing with colic. Studies at the USDA and Prairie View A&M University of Texas confirmed that goat’s milk has more buffering capacity than cow’s milk, soy infant formula, and OTC antacids. Goat’s milk has an alkaline reaction, same as breast milk.

            Goat’s milk is the dairy product with the highest levels of the amino acid L-glutamine which is an alkalinizing amino acid that is an important fuel source for the body and has multiple and critical functions for the heart, brain, skeletal muscles, digestive linings, liver, lungs, and kidneys, often recommended by nutritionist’s. Goat’s milk does not produce acid within the intestinal system which is good considering acidic blood and intestinal pH levels can cause fatigue, headaches, muscle aches/pains, sore pressure points, weight gain, blood sugar imbalance, and excess yeast populations. Goat’s milk contains the highly antimicrobial fatty acids called capric and caprylic acids which are so powerful at killing bacteria that these particular fatty acids killed the bacteria used to test for the presence of antibiotics in cow’s milk as reported by the New England Journal of Medicine. Also unlike cow’s milk which is known to produce mucous as a result of an immune response from our body goat’s milk does not stimulate this response.

            There is a trace mineral called selenium that is commonly lacking in the body though it is a necessary and power-packed nutrient. According to the Journal of Infectious Disease and Patrick selenium helps the body in two ways, controlling the immune system by upgrading when necessary and by downgrading it when it is over-active (as in auto-immune disease). This powerful nutrient also attacks viruses and prevents them from replicating while also improving T-cell function (T-cells are our white blood cells, our soldiers in our immune system that fight illness). Selenium also regulates the production of interleukin another fighter for the immune system and a deficiency in selenium has been linked to HIV/AIDS and other viral diseases. In a publication by the Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemicals goat’s milk has the highest source of this powerhouse nutrient (selenium) than any other milk. Goat’s milk contains more than 2.5 times the selenium than powdered infant formula (19.98mg/L vs. 7.47mg/L) 35% (19.98mg/L vs. 14.85mg/L) more than cow’s milk and even more than breast milk which contains 15.69mg/L vs. 19.98mg/L.

            Goat’s milk contains 7% less lactose than cow’s milk which makes it digest rapidly and does not sit in the intestines to ferment causing an osmotic imbalance that in turn causes digestive upset. Goat’s milk digests in a baby’s stomach within 20 minutes where cow’s milk takes up to 8 hours, more likely to cause stomach issues. This rapid digestion is due to smaller protein molecules than cow’s milk which means the curd tension is half that of cow’s milk. These curds form in the digestive tract when they come in contact with stomach acid so less curd tension means easier digestion.

            From the Journal of Pediatrics, goat’s milk is also non-allergenic, as explained before it does not stimulate the immune system the way cow’s milk does. A child allergic to cow’s milk will show symptoms such as wheezing, congestion, eczema, frequent ear infections, digestive issues, skin rashes and more; switching to goat’s milk has helped a vast majority of the children suffering from these symptoms.

Here is a link to a comparison chart of nutritional value between breast, cow’s, goat’s milk, and a liver based non dairy homemade formula:

 http://www.rockwellnutrition.com/Can-I-use-Goat-Milk-instead-of-infant-formula_ep_92-1.html#breastmilkcomparison

Note some of the most vital nutrients needed for proper development are higher in goat’s milk.

Here’s another comparison chart for active and inactive properties of these milk’s:

BreastMilk_RawMilk_vs_Infant_Formula.pdf

 

            With the question of should I breast feed there are considerations to take into account since many factors influence the breast milk that will in turn affect your baby. Some of the things to consider is your diet, adverse habits such as drug use (legal or non) even prior to giving birth, other health conditions that may prevent beneficial nursing, and factors such as stress or emotional problems, any malady that affects the mother will affect the baby. So if the answer to any of those questions is yes and you want a safe natural alternative that is comparable to breast milk than goat’s milk is the solution.

            According to the National Association for Child Development (NACD) “Goat’s milk is the best food for baby, it compares in chemical balance to a mother’s milk, and nature built the mother’s milk to nurture, not to harm.”

            Pasteurized cow’s milk is not an option for many reasons but mainly it does not compare to raw goat’s milk since it has none of the vital qualities as raw goat milk and is constipating, something a baby with colic does not need. As noted by the NACD “Calves fed pasteurized milk have died within a month, never use pasteurized milk if health is your goal.”

            The Journal of the American Medical Association states “The goat is the healthiest domestic animal known goat milk is superior in every way to cow’s milk. Goat milk is the ideal food for babies, convalescents, and invalids, especially those with weakened digestive powers. Goat milk is the most healthful and complete food known.” I highly recommend reading the article on the NACD website:  http://nacd.org/health/protocol.php.

            The qualities and benefits of goat’s milk are unparalleled and deserve the attention of everyone who wants to improve their health and cannot tolerate cow’s milk or breast milk for any reason, it is a safe and natural alternative. Besides the fact that pasteurization has its definite disadvantages to the quality of dairy you need to consider the hormones and antibiotics that are given to the cows on a regular basis in the industry.        Recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) also known as recombinant bovine somatotropin, (rBST) has been in use for over 10 years and is a staple in America’s dairy products. These dairy products such as milk, cheese, and yogurt, do not have labels stating these hormones are in them, the reason for these hormones is intended to induce dairy cows to be more productive. The Center for Food Safety states that the hormone rBGH was approved in 1993 by the FDA and has ignored pleas from consumers, food safety organizations, and scientists against the use of this hormone, or at least labeling the products so people know it is in there. Even a legal challenge by CFS would not force the FDA to at least reexamine the health threats of rBGH, this even after regulatory bodies in both Canada and Europe rejected the use of the hormone due to numerous animal and human health concerns.

The cows treated with this hormone, rBGH, develop significant health problems such as: 50% increase in the risk of lameness (leg and foot problems), 25% increases in udder infections (mastitis), serious reproductive problems (i.e., infertility, cystic ovaries, fetal loss and birth defects). The vicious cycle that incurs is that because of these health problems in the cows, dairy farmers use more antibiotics to fight these infections and the residues from these antibiotics may also end up in the milk and dairy products. “These residues can cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals and contribute to the growth of antibiotic resistant bacteria, further undermining the efficacy of some antibiotics in fighting human infections” as stated by the Center for Food Safety. With this understanding people should realize the relationship between this and the “super bugs” that have become popular these days along with the fact they are resistant to regular antibiotics. Bringing to light the possible links between the rBGH hormone and its ill effects on cows that is then transferred to their milk and dairy products  mean consumers ingest these products and could be causing the same ill effects in them.

            Also according to the Center for Food Safety (2008) recent research has conclusively shown that the levels of a hormone called “insulin-like growth factor-1” (IFG-1) are increased in dairy products that come from cows treated with rBGH. The FDA completely failed to consider a study done by Canadian and European regulators that showed how the increased IGF-1 in rBGH milk can survive human digestion and find its way into the intestines and blood stream of consumers. Numerous studies show the significance of these findings because they prove that IGF-1 is an important factor in the growth of breast, prostate and colon cancers.

            The CFS has been legally fighting the FDA for the removal of these hormones, Monsanto’s rBGH/rBST, (trade name Prosilac), for years and continues to do so despite constant denials from the FDA. Note: this information, in regards to hormones and antibiotics include the meat people consume too, mostly beef.

            So considering all these facts you be the judge in what’s best for you and your baby’s health, be informed and make decisions that protect your family’s health and wellness. Don’t be fooled by the ads for products that have little to no nutritional value in the long run and are tainted by chemicals the human body was not designed to take in.

            I lived with 2 baby’s that had colic and the only thing that worked was goat’s milk, I urge you to research it, consider it for your baby and your whole family, believe me when I say it saved me from the insanity that is colic. 

            To find certified organic raw milk go to http://www.realmilk.com/where2.html and search your state.

(Extra fact: Mylicon drops for infant colic contain D&C Red 22 and D&C Red 28 dyes which are made from petrochemicals and are linked to hyperactivity, impulsivity, ADHD, and learning problems in children (Center for Science in the Public Interest). Stay away from ANY food dyes they are dangerous to everyone.

 There has been a recent recall on Mylicon drops for metal fragments: http://www.mylicon.com/page.jhtml?id=mylicon/press_release.inc

 

 

 

 

References:

Ansel, M.D., D. (1999). Infant colic. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from Childrens Medical Office of North Andover, P.C. Web site: http://www.chmed.com/mod.php?mod=userpage&page_id=101&menu=1522

Center for Food and Safety, (2008). rBGH / rBST. Retrieved January 25, 2009, from

 Center for Food and Safety Web site: http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/rbgh2.cfm

 

Center for Science in the Public Interest, (2009). Food dyes & children’s behavior. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from Center for Science in the Public Interest Web site: http://www.cspinet.org/fooddyes/index.html

Rockwell Nutrition, (2008). Can I use goat milk instead of infant formula. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from Rockwell Nutrition Web site: http://www.rockwellnutrition.com/Can-I-use-Goat-Milk-instead-of-infant-formula_ep_92-1.html#breastmilkcomparison

The National Association for Childhood Developement, (2008). Nutritional Protocol for Infants – Ages 0 to 2 years. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from The National Association for Childhood Developement Web site: http://nacd.org/health/protocol.php

White Egret Farm, (2009). Why it’s a Better Choice for You and Your Child: the Facts . Retrieved June 27, 2009, from White Egret Farm Web site: http://www.whiteegretfarm.com/html/milk.html

World’s Healthiest Foods, (2009). Goat’s milk: In-depth nutrition analysis. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from World’s Healthiest Foods Web site: http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=nutrientprofile&dbid=56

World’s Healthiest Foods, (2009). Milk, goat. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from World’s Healthiest Foods Web site: http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&dbid=131

PARK, 1991. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 74:3326-3333, AND GAMBLE, J.A., ELLIS, N.R., BESLEY, A.K., 1939. COMPOSITION AND PROPERTIES OF GOAT’S MILK AS COMPARED WITH COW’S MILK. TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 671, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 209280-40-1.

MEHAIA, M.A., 1989. STUDIES ON CAMEL AND GOAT MILK PROTEINS: NITROGEN DISTRIBUTION AND AMINO ACID COMPOSITION. NUTRITION REPORTS INTERNATIONAL, 39 (2):351-357.

HAENLEIN, G.F.W. GOAT MANAGEMENT: LIPIDS AND PROTEINS IN MILK, PARTICULARLY GOAT MILK. DELAWARE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION HTTP://BLUEHEN.AGS.UDEL.EDU/DECES/GOATMGT/GM-08.HTM, AND HINCKLEY, L.S., 1991. QUALITY STANDARDS FOR GOAT MILK. DAIRY, FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION, 11(9): 511-512.

BAUM, et al., 2000. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND PATRICK, et al., 1999. ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE REVIEW

RODRIGUEZ, E.M., SANZ ALAEJOS, M., DIAZ ROMERO, C., 1999. CHEMOMETRIC STUDIES OF SEVERAL MINERALS IN MILKS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 47: 1520-4.

BISHOP, et al., 1990. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 116:862-867; PARK, 1994. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 14:151-159; AND WALKER, 1965. BRITISH GOAT SOCIETY YEARBOOK, 24-26:23-26

Comments (1) »

Alternative Fuel Cars, Let’s figure it out.

Making a change to alternative or advanced fuel vehicles is something that must happen our dependence on foreign oil is absurd and unnecessary. There have been many theory’s and proven possibilities to alternative fuel vehicles some of the problems these alternatives faced has been the auto industry and big oil companies since changing over to alternative fuels would hurt their business and kill their profits. Big oil companies most certainly don’t want to lose the revenue they make on our dependence on oil, so a lot of patents and plans to the alternative fuel movement were bought and put on the shelf, so to speak, and the oil dependency stayed strong. Now with a public outcry for change and a new administration wanting to make positive change happen we are looking at a new era of alternative energy in many ways including the auto industry.

The challenges or obstacles of introducing these new technologies to the consumer will be mostly cost, if they want people to buy these products they have to be affordable to everyone. I think people are hungry for these changes and genuinely want them but cost will be the determining factor of how well the change happens. The public wants to do their part and save the planet and become energy independent but the affordability is the underlying factor especially in the economy as of late.

Some car companies may not want to adopt these technologies because the loss of money from the cars already made the “old way” and still on the market so there will be profit loss there, not to mention the conversion within the factories to make these new vehicles, new parts, new training, changing some machinery to suit the new cars. Luckily with the push in this new direction the current administration will not give the auto makers a choice they will have to abide to the laws that will be put in place, it’s been obvious that the current ways the auto companies have been going is not working so change is needed.

As I said before the biggest problem having consumers adopt these new technologies will be cost, to me that is the only issue people could have with this change. The green movement, global warming, and saving the planet is at the fore front of every ones minds these days, if we don’t make the necessary changes we won’t have to worry about anything because there won’t be anything left of the planet to worry about, survival will be the only issue. So making new technologies available to every person is the challenge that needs to be addressed.

New dangers with these new technologies (fuel alternative cars) may be few since the dangers we face as it stands now is much more extreme like the wars over oil, drilling, emissions, etc. With the alternatives I see electric vehicles being the biggest danger because of the use of more electricity leaving an even bigger carbon footprint than we already do and the short running time of these cars. I wouldn’t want to worry about running out of “juice” on a long trip or when I’m in the middle of nowhere and I can’t plug in that’s where I think this kind of alternative should be debated a lot more.

Bottom line is we have to make these changes no matter what for many reasons there just needs to be a cost effective, most planet friendly, choice that is the best for everyone.

U.S. Department of Energy, (2009, February 3). Alternative & Advanced Vehicles. Retrieved April 13, 2009, from Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Web site: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/vehicles/index.html

Comments (1) »

Domestic Violence

Does the punishment always fit the crime?

This is an account of a typical domestic abuse scenario by C. Mann “Knocked Senseless” from archivesalon.com.

“Feb. 22, 2001: I am standing in front of my closet. It is 6:30 in the morning and I am in my bathrobe, having just emerged from the shower. I am trying to decide what to wear to work. The kids are still in bed and my husband is downstairs. He has already set the tone for the day by bolting from the bed and telling my waking self from the doorway of our bedroom”, “My God, you are an ugly woman.”

“I am reaching for my flowered dress, the long one that flares in great clouds around me, and mentally finding tights, black shoes, silver earrings, when I hear my husband step through the door behind me. He doesn’t speak; he simply takes giant strides toward me. Two steps and he is there. His arm is pulled back and his face is a mask and I know the dog has awakened.”

“All goes into slow motion as I watch what is about to happen. I think in a detached way that it is just like the movies, this arm pulled back, its slow approach, the smack of fist against bone, and then I feel the hard white pain of that fist, his right hand, the hand that has held mine, that has made love to me, that has reached for me, all knotted up now with rage behind it, and he hits me high on the face, on my cheekbone, just beneath my eye, and I am lifted from my feet and knocked backward into the closet, clutching at dresses to break my fall.”

“It has taken 10 seconds. I land in a heap on the dusty floor. There. I am knocked down, disappeared from his view, only my feet showing. My husband is satisfied and leaves the room as quickly as he entered it. Dimly, I hear him rousing the children, calling them to breakfast.”

 “I think of him, driving now to work, this morning’s fist to his wife’s face already the past for him, his mind dismissing it and turning to the day ahead. If I had a gun I would shoot him next time he approached me from behind” (Mann 2001 p.1).

A woman is assaulted every 1.7 minutes a staggering statistic but this is something that is happening every day, every minute and most times ignored or brushed off by the very people that are suppose to help. So where is the line drawn between self defense and murder? How much can a person take before saying it’s enough I have to defend my life by ending his? These are the hard realities women face from being abused daily to a point of near death and the very real fear of facing their own death as a result of one of these attacks. It happens often and human nature tells us to fight to survive, its instinct and not the easy choice but in the face of inherent danger it’s a choice that must be made.

Women are told to get a restraining order which is a piece of paper that orders the accused abuser to stay X amount of feet away from the accuser and have no contact. But a piece of paper serves no protection when the accused confronts the accuser and wants revenge hence another life threatening beating, or worse, incurs. The restraining order when acted upon by police is little if any protection, the accused can be removed and brought to jail but not held, the police can only act with an arrest when abuse has already happened and then it could be too late not to mention if she can even get to a phone or maybe he has already ripped it out of the wall. Restraining orders often provoke the abuser since the law was brought into the mix and they feel they were wronged by the accuser while also feeling that the accuser is their “property” and feel their actions are justified through their eyes.

So what are the alternatives for the one being threatened, run, hide is it that easy to uproot a life, leave everyone and everything you know or may own also if children are involved the options are even harder to consider, she can’t leave her kids but if she takes them could possibly face kidnapping charges. An abuser is a predator that will do anything and go to any lengths to get to their accuser while being the one stalked is a horrible way to live not knowing when you will be found, every noise puts you on edge, every outing you are looking over your shoulder in fear of being found or if you will survive if you are.

 “Police were more likely to respond within 5 minutes if the offender was a stranger than if an offender was known to the female victim” (Ronet Bachman Ph.D., U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Violence Against Women: A National Crime Victimization Survey Report,” January 1994, p. 9).

Women who are charged with the murder of their mate have little if any criminal record yet they receive longer sentences than men who kill their mates. FBI statistics show that fewer men are charged with first or second degree murder for killing a woman they know than a woman is for a man she knows, bringing up the question of fairness of punishment since the average penalty is 15 years for women. According to Senator Barbara Boxer, “90% of all family violence defendants are never prosecuted, and one-third of the cases that would be considered felonies if committed by strangers are filed as misdemeanors (a lesser crime)” (Boxer, September 2, 1993).

Bringing a person to commit murder can result from many things one being post traumatic stress disorder or battered woman syndrome, a subgroup of PTSD. PTSD is caused by any event that is life threatening or by compromising the emotional well-being of the person by things such as rape, assault, enduring physical, sexual, emotional or any type of abuse. These types of traumas inflicted over time causes many life altering changes such as “persistent feelings of helplessness, shame, guilt or being completely different from others; feeling the perpetrator of trauma is all-powerful and preoccupation with either revenge against or allegiance with the perpetrator; and severe change in those things that give the sufferer meaning, like a loss of spiritual faith or an ongoing sense of helplessness, hopelessness, or despair” (Medicinenet, 2009, p.3). When someone is exposed to the feelings described above on a constant basis the human response is to completely give up, and probably die, or decide to fight back against their attacker to survive, this is what these women face in their daily life when being abused. Yet this seems to be overlooked as a cause of their criminal act even though it is a very real mental illness that can result in devastating results for all involved. Granted this could be a slippery slope for all who commit murder in some form but in real cases of long term abuse it should be evaluated as a clear argument for the defendant.

Statistics show that men commit 85% of all homicides and 90% of the women who are in jail for a homicide is because of domestic abuse and self defense (Bass 1992). Women, by nature, are not “killers” they are the nurturers, and caregivers not prone to violence but in the case of continual threats and violence they will act out for survival as is in all human nature. According to Stacey Kabat during a presentation at Harvard School of Public Health, Center for Health Communication there are over 2000 battered women in America serving prison time for defending their lives against their abusers (1991), a stunning statistic considering their reason for committing the crime. The American Medical Association reported in 1992 “that as many as 1 in 3 women will be assaulted by a domestic partner in her lifetime – 4 million in any given year.” While that is a staggering statistic, the average prison sentence for a man that kills their female partners is 2 to 6 years yet women who kill their partner average a sentence of 15 years despite most of these women killed in self defense; there is a clear unbalance here where our justice system is failing miserably. What could be a logical reason for the difference in punishment for basically the same crime, a mostly male world within the justice arena, a biased view from the prosecutors, or judges and juries, it may never be known but the discrepancy in sentencing between the sexes is completely wrong.

In the disturbing world of domestic violence there is a growing twist added to the mix where women are being arrested when the police are called to the scene of the domestic dispute. This twist is the victim being mistakenly designated as the perpetrator by the police who are failing to determine the dominate aggressor either from officer hostility against women, officer resentment of treating domestic abuse as a serious crime, or because the officer does not correctly identify defensive wounds on the woman who defends herself. While these are disturbing enough there is also the cases where the domestic violence perpetrators themselves have become more sophisticated at turning the law on the woman by calling 911 themselves and/or purposely injuring themselves prior to the police arriving. Though most of these arrests go un-convicted because of flimsy evidence or just failure to prosecute it is another aspect of trauma to the victim of the abuse she has gone through and the injustice of the arrest in general; the other intense fear for these women is if they have children the perpetrator can use the arrest to get custody of the children and this is a real possibility (De Santis 2000). This is one more form of abuse the victim must endure in a long list that weighs on her mind and drives her toward a more permanent answer. Even a pet, like a dog, will turn on their owner after being abused over and over and backed into the proverbial corner; nature provides the instinct to survive at any cost.

Studies have shown that there is a “turning point” when a woman kills her abuser which include “alcohol abuse, death threats, threats with weapons, more severe battering and sexual violence toward the woman and/or others in the family” (Easteal, n/d). The killing is usually preceded by an event or incident out of the normal repertoire of violence and usually concerns the children by threatening their lives or where he begins to sexually assault one or more of the children thus causing the “turning point” and the statement “he never did that before” bringing the woman beyond what she has learned to live with. It is one thing to endure abuse of ones-self but the protectiveness for their children or others close to her will drive a woman over the edge to commit the ultimate end to the situation.

There has been success in the argument of battered woman’s syndrome (BWS) and self defense in some homicide cases one being People v. Torres, in 1985 a New York Supreme Court decision the presiding judge stated:

 “. . . It is the defendant’s state of mind and sense of fear which is critical to a justification defense. In this regard, proof of violent acts previously committed by the victim against the defendant as well as any evidence that the defendant was aware of specific prior violent acts by the victim upon third parties is admissible as bearing upon the reasonableness of the defendant’s apprehension of danger at the time of the encounter” (Blackman 1989, pp. 188-9).

In a battering situation the threat of violence is always there so it needs to be remembered that the women in these cases are not saying because they are abused they have the right to kill but that because of the history of violence within the relationship the woman becomes “sensitive to cues from the batterer” which generates a feeling or belief of imminent danger (Easteal n/d). This theory at least recognizes the underlying mental state of a woman that has been abused to the point of committing murder.     

Obviously there are cases where the self defense argument has worked but the overall number of women in jail for the same crime is staggering this just shows the inconsistency of the law and how not everyone gets the fair due process our constitution states we are entitled to. Crime and punishment is a tricky “business” as it travels through our halls of justice, minimal to maximum sentencing for the same crime is truly unfair especially in the cases of domestic abuse. Regardless of every case being different with possibly differing circumstances the underlying facts in every case of abuse are the same, a constant threat to someone’s life and the lives of their families cause a proven psychological syndrome that drives the person to kill for their very survival. So punishment for this basic instinct should be revised and spread evenly across this country since the victim (the accused) has been punished enough.

I have lived this life of abuse twice but managed to smarten up and get out once it finally sank in that it will never stop, I also contemplated killing for my life, but no matter how much you love someone or think your actions could change them it won’t, please believe that. You start to doubt everything and every belief you ever had to let the situation make sense in your mind but the bottom line is there is no sense to any of the abuse and it’s wrong on every level. I fell into every profile, low self esteem, the need to fix it, wanting to hold my family together, you name it I felt it but in retrospect I see my denial and now I know I deserve so much better, I know I’m worth so much more than being in a relationship that destroys me a little at a time. I also know it’s easy to be on the outside and judge a person for staying in a situation like this or any other, but no one has a right to judge until they walk a mile in another person’s shoes, as the saying goes. It’s easy to be detached from any of the feelings or decisions that will affect your life when you’re not the one making or feeling them, but I have learned to not say “I would never…” because until you are there living it you don’t know what you would do. Now that I have been away from these poisonous relationships for over 4 years I am so much stronger and confident in myself and what I want, while strong in the fact I will never go back to something like that ever again. I deserve all the goodness life has to offer I only wish I realized that much earlier and avoided a lot of pain, mentally and physically, but I made it and I am stronger for it and no one will ever take that away from me again. Remember sometimes the hardest decision you ever make is the right one, I promise.

Charlene

Cybergrrl, (1996). Battered women who kill. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from Cybergrrl Web site: http://home.cybergrrl.com/dv/stat/statbwkill.html

De Santis, M. (2000). Advocating for domestic violence victims who have been arrested for domestic violence. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from Womens Justice Center Web site: http://www.justicewomen.com/tips_dv_victims.html

Easteal, P. (n/d). Battered women who kill: A plea of self defense. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from AIC.gov Web site: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/proceedings/16/Easteal1.pdf

Hawthorne Domestic Response Violence Team , (2009). Women and domestic violence . Retrieved April 25, 2009, from Hawthorne Domestic Response Violence Team Web site: http://hawthornedvrt.org/Women-and-Domestic-Violence.htm

Mann, C. (2000). Knocked senselss. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from Salon.com Web site: http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/02/22/battered/index.html

Medicinnet, (2009, April). Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Retrieved April 20, 2009, from Medicinenet Web site: http://www.medicinenet.com/posttraumatic_stress_disorder/article.htm

Stabile, L. (2008, February, 11). Palmer students told story of domestic abuse. The Republican, Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://www.woodhull.org/pdfs/Domestic%20Abuse.pdf

Comments (1) »

Pesticides and the ozone

I remember when the ozone issue started coming to light and people made jokes about women using hairspray (aerosol) and the depletion of the ozone, but the use of pesticides has a ongoing effect that causes a chain reaction much worse for the ozone. The pesticides kill bugs, even beneficial ones, the chemicals go into the air and seep into the ground killing plant life also, the plant life is needed for air quality so everything the pesticides do has detrimental effects on the environment overall. It upsets the natural balance of the planet. I found an article relating to pesticides and the ozone here is a little bit of it: “Methyl bromide is a highly toxic fungicide and the second most widely applied pesticide in the world. It is primarily used on “high value” export crops bound for North America, European, and East Asian markets, such as tomatoes, peppers, grapes, strawberries, tobacco and flowers. Methyl bromide is also used to protect stored grains. The pesticide is effective against a wide range of pests including insects, worms, and pathogenic microorganisms.

However, methyl bromide has a dramatic environmental impact. After being sprayed on crops, the pesticide drifts into the upper atmosphere where it damages the ozone layer, which blocks ultraviolet (UV) rays from reaching the Earth’s surface. Although a shorter-lived substance than chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) — a better-known family of ozone-depleting compounds — methyl bromide destroys ozone molecules at 50 times the rate of CFCs. In a 1994 scientific assessment, the World Meteorological Organization concluded that phasing out this chemical is the single largest step that governments can take to protect the ozone layer” (Fairholm, 1997).

So the short and long term effects of these chemicals and the amount used in the world is having the biggest effect on the planet and the ozone, I don’t think there is anything else used in such volume that has the same effect.

 

Fairholm, J. (1997 April 11). Saving the ozone layer: Alternatives to methyl bromide . Retrieved April 9, 2009, from IDRC Web site: http://archive.idrc.ca/books/reports/1997/14-01e.html

Leave a comment »

Our Ozone, what’s up?

Some of the causes and implications of the ozone hole in the atmosphere:

Causes and implications: The blatant use of pesticides, volatile chemicals like chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), halons, methyl bromide, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform (EPA 2008). All these are manmade and are in common things we use every day, I remember the big campaign over aerosol hairspray and the fact that women use so much of it, but ironically this was happening as they were creating stronger more dangerous chemicals for pesticides and spraying these chemicals on thousands of acres of land. Looking at the two I would say the pesticide spraying did way more damage than women and hairspray, and another irony with the pesticides is as it depletes the ozone layer the UV rays are killing the food source these pesticides are trying to “protect”. Along with these issues we face health issues with the depletion of the ozone layer, like the rise in skin cancer, or poor air quality that causes breathing problems and a variety of different health problems. If you think about it there is a vicious circle here, poor air quality leads to people being inside using more energy (air conditioners) causing a bigger carbon imprint, causing global warming and more of a loss in ozone, not getting vitamin D (which we seem to be more and more deficient in lately), causing more health issues and I can go on and on. Bottom line, as I keep going back to, is every single (natural) thing on this planet depends on balance, when one thing is disrupted it creates a chain reaction that will eventually kill the planet if we don’t change our ways.   

          Scientists predict that the ozone layer can and will repair itself by 2050 if the right steps are taken to lessen or prevent the use of the chemicals that have been depleting it in the first place. The EPA and other worldwide environmental agencies have taken some steps to lessen or stop the use of the chemicals that have been at the heart of the problem by banning the use of some chemicals (EPA 2008).

          We need to be concerned about the ozone depletion because it affects our health and the future of our planet, without intervention with this problem our children and grandchildren will not survive since our planet will not survive. We are already seeing the effects of pollution and air quality in the rise in illness caused by this so if let go it will only get worse. These problems of air quality are obviously worse in cities and suburbs because of the concentration of cars and their emissions, buildings and the use of energy, lack of trees and greenery to produce oxygen and absorb carbon dioxide, everything is compacted and concentrated in these areas. Cutting down on energy use, electric or “green” cars, creating more areas of plants and greenery could all help these areas cut down their impact on the pollution and ozone depletion.

          People could be more pro-active by cutting down on their driving and their use of energy, turn off things they don’t need or use, turn their thermostats down, dry their clothes outside, stop using harmful chemicals, the list goes on. Plant gardens and grow organically, no chemical pesticides, walk when possible, make trips in the car only when necessary and combine errands so it’s one trip instead of many, buy “green” products, anything that involves a more natural lifestyle. All these things can help both the ground and atmospheric ozone while helping ourselves by improving our health and the health of our planet.

Here’s an article about the top ten worst polluting companies and of course they are in the United States, (we really have to change things in this country): http://247wallst.com/2009/04/02/the-%e2%80%9cgreen%e2%80%9d-hypocrisy-america%e2%80%99s-corporate-environment-champions-pollute-the-world/

 

National Library of Medicine, (2008, November 6). Ozone. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from Toxtown Web site: http://toxtown.nlm.nih.gov/text_version/chemicals.php?id=20

 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2009, January 26). Ozone – good up high bad nearby. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/gooduphigh/good.html#3

 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2008, August 25). Ozone layer depletion-science. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Web site: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/q_a.html#q4

Leave a comment »

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Comments (1) »